Your cookie settings

We and our partners use cookies and similar technologies to help you with your payments and journeys, remember your login, use webchat, understand how our website is used and show you content and adverts you might be interested in.

Some of our partners rely on legitimate interests to use your personal data, instead of your consent. You have the right to reject this. View our partners to find out more.

Find out more about our cookies and how to manage your settings. If this page is blocked by a cookie pop-up, choose ‘Accept only essential cookies’ to then see the page.

We use essential cookies to ensure our website works properly. Any other cookies will only be set if you select ‘Accept all cookies’ below or by clicking ‘Manage cookies’ to learn more.

Engineering Standards Challenge

Standards are the detailed TfL-owned requirements that underpin how our various transport modes and improvement projects are run.

TfL Engineering brings all of our engineering functions together across our various modes. This helps us to identify and question differences between equivalent standards.

We want your ideas on how we can encourage greater innovation, cost efficiency and third party funding into our network, while maintaining safety. We developed a standards challenge process in partnership with the Railway Industry Association (RIA), following a successful initiative developed by Network Rail.

If you think that a standard is inappropriate for some (or all) applications, doesn't enable the application of best practice, or drives increased cost without comparable benefit, email TfLStandardsReview@tfl.gov.uk.

Your suggestion should include the following information:

  • Standard name and number if applicable
  • Clause/requirement if applicable
  • Discipline
  • Problem Statement
  • Barrier type (for example whole life cost, innovation, safety, production cost, maintenance cost or risk)
  • What is the opportunity?
  • Why should we make this change?
  • Who should we talk to about this proposal?
  • How should we contact them?

We're also interested in your thoughts on the blockers to innovative (but non-compliant) solutions and how these can be overcome.

We'll review all challenges received and conduct a rigorous impact assessment across a broad range of output capabilities (such as safety, performance, environment and compatibility) to make sure these capabilities are not compromised. We will respond within four weeks with a proposed way forward.