FOI request detail

Review of Innovative Contractor Engagement on the Bank Station Capacity Upgrade

Request ID: FOI-0848-1718
Date published: 08 August 2017

You asked
Please can I have copies of the following documents pertaining to the procurement process known as Innovative Contractor Engagement (ICE) Specifically, please can I have copies of the following documents which are referred to in the 2014 Innovative Contractor Engagement Project report (https://www.secbe.org.uk/content/panels/Report%20-%20Innovative%20Contractor%20Engagement%20Procurement%20Model%20-%20Bank%20Station%20Capacity%20Upgrade-6d5f2a.pdf): • the November 2011 paper from LU Programme Director of Crossrail and Stations to Infrastructure UK (page 12) • the Invitation to Participate (page 18) • the CGAP, EE and IIPAG reviews • the ICE Procurement Execution Plan (page 28) • the proceedings and outcomes of the three lessons learnt workshops - 15/11/12, 09/08/23, 15/08/13 (pages 56-58) • the Lessons Learnt Report (page 56) • the results from the survey of the bidders (page 56) • the Bidder Lessons Learnt report (page 58) Additionally, in the use of Innovative Contractor Engagement on the Bank Station Capacity Upgrade: How much did TfL contribute to the contractors bid costs? How much did TfL pay for the IP on losing bids?

We answered

Our ref: FOI-0848-1718/GH

 

Thank you for your request received by Transport for London (TfL) on 10 July 2017 asking for information about the Bank Station Capacity Upgrade.

 

Your request has been considered under the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and our information access policy. I can confirm that we do hold some of the information you require.

 

  1. November 2011 paper from LU Programme Director of Crossrail and Stations to Infrastructure UK (page12) – Although we have undertaken an extensive search of our email system we have been unable to locate a copy of this paper. Please accept our apologies.

     



  2. Invitation to Participate (page 18) – A draft copy is attached. Unfortunately we have been unable to locate a final copy.

     



  3. CGAP Gate D Assurance Report (RUB 23/4/13)

     



  4. CGAP Gate D Assurance Report ( PPP 8/5/13)

     



  5. IIPAG Gate D Initial Bid Inspection – 12/4/13

     



  6. IIPAG 5/5/13 Review

     



  7. ICE Procurement Execution Plan

     



  8. 4-1-13 Lessons learned report R14

     



  9. 13-9-13 Internal lessons learnt

     



  10. Bidder Lessons learned report 17.9.13

 

The documents requested in 3) – 10) above are attached.

 

The other three documents referred to below, we believe, are a duplication of the documents noted in items 8 to 10 above. No other lessons learnt reports have been located.

  1. Lessons Learnt Report (page 56)

  2. Results from the survey of the bidders (page 56)

  3. Bidder Lessons Learnt report (page 58)

 

In respect of the other questions you have raised:

 

How much did TfL contribute to the contractors bid costs?

This is covered in the attachments (lesson learnt report 17.9.13) – TfL contributed £200,000 to each bidders costs

 

How much did TfL pay for the IP on losing bids?

This is covered in the attachments (lesson learnt report 17.9.13) and states £940,000.

 

If this is not the information you are looking for, or if you are unable to access it for some reason, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

If you are not satisfied with this response please see the attached information sheet for details of your right to appeal.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Graham Hurt

 

FOI Case Officer

FOI Case Management Team

General Counsel

Transport for London

Attachments

f

PDF

a

PDF

c

PDF

h

PDF

e

PDF

g

PDF

d

PDF

b

PDF

i

PDF
Back to top

Want to make a request?

We'll email you the response within 20 working days.


We'll publish the response online without disclosing any personal information.

Make a request

Something wrong with this request?


If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention, at foi@tfl.gov.uk