Congestion Charging
Request ID: FOI-0139-1920
Date published: 09 May 2019
You asked
F/on from FOI-3035-1819
I am requesting information specifically related to Fleur di Lis St, London E1.
This information is not available on the websites indicated in your reply.
We answered
TfL Ref: FOI-0139-1920
Thank you for your email of 9th April 2019 asking for information about congestion charge fines issued in relation to Fleur de Lis Street, London E1.
Your request has been considered in accordance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act and our information access policy. I can confirm that we hold some of the information you require.
Specifically you asked to know:
- The total number of Congestion Charge fines issued since 2014
- The total number of appeals against such fines and reasons for the appeals
- The total number of appeals rejected and the reasons for rejection
- The total number of appeals upheld
We do not hold data prior to August 2016.
Note that we issue Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) when we have reason to believe a contravention occurred. All PCNs are subject to a statutory representations and appeals process. Should a driver believe the PCN was issued incorrectly, they can challenge the PCN. The tables below detail how many PCNs we issued on Fleur di Lis Street for non-payment of the Congestion Charge in 2016, 2017 and 2018. They also show how many representations were made, the reasons for representation, the amount of Appeals and the Appeals reasons.
Summary data:
|
Fleur De Lis Street
|
PCNs Issued
|
Representations
|
Appeals
|
|
2016 (Aug – Dec only)
|
430
|
Accepted = 23
Rejected = 2
|
Allowed = 0
No contest = 0
Refused = 7
Withdrawn = 0
Open = 0
|
|
2017
|
969
|
Accepted = 56
Rejected = 4
|
Allowed = 0
No contest = 1
Refused = 4
Withdrawn = 0
Open = 0
|
|
2018
|
893
|
Accepted = 54
Rejected = 4
|
Allowed = 0
No contest = 5
Refused = 6
Withdrawn = 0
Open = 2
|
|
* PCNs by contravention date.
Data only available from August 2016 onwards due to systems change
Stage 1: PCN issued. If this is contested, the next stage is usually a representation
|
|
Stage 2: Request for appeal against a PCN - representation. When representation decision is contested, then this moves onto the next stage
|
|
Stage 3: Appeal against TfL's decision
|
Representations 2018:
|
Decision
|
Accepted
|
Decision
|
Rejected
|
|
A015 - CCAP Payment Error - 1st Contravention
|
9
|
R003 - Believed was subject to 100% discount
|
1
|
|
A016 - CCAP VRM Error - 1st Contravention
|
13
|
R079 - Registered with LTPH (London Taxi Private Hire)
|
1
|
|
A091 - Ringer/ Clone
|
1
|
R094 - Unaware of Scheme/ How it Operates
|
1
|
|
A098 - Sold vehicle before DOC(s)
|
3
|
R099 - Vehicle should have been on CC Auto Pay Account
|
1
|
|
A107 - Valid Hire Agreement - Liability Transferred
|
18
|
|
|
|
A108 - Vehicle not activated to CC Auto Pay Account
|
1
|
|
|
|
A111 - Vehicle Tax Class Exempt
|
1
|
|
|
|
A112 - VRM Account Error (Customer Error)
|
1
|
|
|
|
A122 - Blue Badge - 1st Contravention
|
6
|
|
|
|
A125 - Paid incorrect VRM/Date via Web
|
1
|
|
|
Representations 2017:
|
Decision
|
Accepted
|
Decision
|
Rejected
|
|
A007 - Blue Badge - Not Registered
|
1
|
R034 - Hire - Period for 6 months or more
|
2
|
|
A009 - Bought vehicle after DOC(s)
|
1
|
R064 - Paid for incorrect VRM / Date of Travel - Web
|
1
|
|
A015 - CCAP Payment Error - 1st Contravention
|
1
|
R099 - Vehicle should have been on CC Auto Pay Account
|
1
|
|
A016 - CCAP VRM Error - 1st Contravention
|
5
|
|
|
|
A045 - Insolvent/ liquidated
|
1
|
|
|
|
A076 - Paid for Incorrect VRM web
|
1
|
|
|
|
A080 - Processing Error - Application
|
3
|
|
|
|
A084 - Processing Error - System/ Technical
|
3
|
|
|
|
A091 - Ringer/ Clone
|
1
|
|
|
|
A098 - Sold vehicle before DOC(s)
|
3
|
|
|
|
A103 - Taxi & Private Hire Vehicle
|
1
|
|
|
|
A105 - ULED - Not Registered
|
1
|
|
|
|
A107 - Valid Hire Agreement - Liability Transferred
|
21
|
|
|
|
A108 - Vehicle not activated to CC Auto Pay Account
|
3
|
|
|
|
A112 - VRM Account Error (Customer Error)
|
2
|
|
|
|
A122 - Blue Badge - 1st Contravention
|
5
|
|
|
|
A123 - Paid incorrect VRM/Date via IVR
|
1
|
|
|
|
A125 - Paid incorrect VRM/Date via Web
|
2
|
|
|
Representations 2016 (Aug-Dec):
|
Decision
|
Accepted
|
Decision
|
Rejected
|
|
A015 - CCAP Payment Error - 1st Contravention
|
5
|
R094 - Unaware of Scheme/ How it Operates
|
1
|
|
A107 - Valid Hire Agreement - Liability Transferred
|
5
|
R092 - ULED - Not eligible for discount
|
1
|
|
A125 - Paid incorrect VRM/Date via Web
|
3
|
|
|
|
A080 - Processing Error - Application
|
3
|
|
|
|
A016 - CCAP VRM Error - 1st Contravention
|
2
|
|
|
|
A091 - Ringer/ Clone
|
2
|
|
|
|
A108 - Vehicle not activated to CC Auto Pay Account
|
1
|
|
|
|
A105 - ULED - Not Registered
|
1
|
|
|
|
A098 - Sold vehicle before DOC(s)
|
1
|
|
|
If this is not the information you are looking for please do not hesitate to contact me.
Please see the attached information sheet for details of your right to appeal as well as information on copyright and what to do if you would like to re-use any of the information we have disclosed.
Yours sincerely,
David Wells
FOI Case Officer
FOI Case Management Team
General Counsel
Transport for London
Back to top
