Buses performance data
Measuring performance
We measure network performance by comparing the number of kilometres a route has done in the last quarter.
We compare each quarter to the same quarter of the previous year, rather than the last quarter of the same year. This is because factors affecting performance, like traffic conditions, can vary depending on the time of year, so this system makes it possible to identify underlying trends.
Scheduled kilometres may not be met because journeys are cancelled or suspended due to:
- Traffic congestion
- Staff availability
- Engineering problems or mechanical breakdown
Quality of service indicators (QSI) are used to monitor service reliability.
Customer satisfaction
We ask a sample of passengers to give a score out of 100 on a wide range of bus service features, based on the journey they have just made. Passengers are carefully selected each quarter to represent all bus passengers in London.
Recent figures can be found in the latest quarter summary document below.
Defining the passenger journey
A passenger journey is defined as one ride on a single vehicle - not a bus trip from A to B as this may include more than one bus ride.
Statistics include all London Buses' contracted services but exclude any non-scheduled kilometres, London Service Permit routes and other special services.
Latest reports
The following reports summarise performance statistics (based on a variety of criteria):
-
Annual Network Performance Summary 2023/24
-
Quarterly Network Performance Summary - Q2 2024/25
-
Long Term Trend Performance Graphs - to end of 2020/21
-
Bus service usage: passengers and kilometres operated by route 2023/24
-
Bus User Survey (2014)
-
Good and Improved routes by Borough - (No longer being produced)
Bus speeds reports
We monitor the speeds of buses to understand the impacts of changing road network conditions. Bus speeds include time spent stationary (for example at traffic lights and at bus stops). Bus speeds are available for the entire network, by borough, and by route.
- All data is in miles per hour
- All AM data is taken for Mondays to Fridays, School and Non School days, between 07:00 and 10:00
- At Route level, some routes may be appear twice. This is because a service change happened during a period. A service change may include a change to a route structure, contract or operator
-
Network - All day types & all hours - to P08 2024/25
-
Network - Monday to Friday AM peak (07.00 to 10.00) - to P08 2024/25
-
Borough - All day types & all hours - to P08 2024/25
-
Borough - Monday to Friday AM peak (07.00 to 10.00) - to P08 2024/25
-
Route - All day types & all hours - to P08 2024/25
-
Route - Monday to Friday AM peak (07.00 to 10.00) - to P08 2024/25
Factors affecting performance
Quarter 2 2024/25 (22 June to 13 September 2024)
Bus Network Performance is affected by seasonality factors such as school holidays and seasonal weather conditions. This means when considering performance for a particular quarter it can be more meaningful to compare results with the same quarter in the previous year rather than the previous quarter.
Quarter 2 performance for 2024/25 for most metrics was worse than the equivalent quarter last year. Performance was generally worse than the last pre-pandemic Q2 in 2019-20.
The percentage of scheduled services that were operated in Quarter 2 was slightly worse than Q2 last year and was worse than the pre-pandemic baseline. There were several disruptive events in this quarter which included multiple Central London demonstrations, unsocial behaviour, Blackwall Tunnel closure, Notting Hill Carnival and burst water mains as well as the usual occurrence of emergency incidents and roadworks. Overall traffic lost mileage was worse than the same quarter last year.
Staff sickness/absence and shortage of drivers remained slightly higher than historic expectations, but the situation is improving, with the underlying position having stabilised, and the overall result for the quarter was much better than Q2 last year. Mileage not operated due to mechanical issues remains higher than historical expectations with issues around parts supply, engineering staff shortages and the roll out of electric vehicles all having an impact. In the latest quarter performance was worse than the Q2 last year.
Until 2017, average bus speeds had been in consistent decline, but the rate of decline slowed over the next three years, although speeds remained much slower than in the past. The pandemic restrictions saw bus speeds increase significantly in 2020/21 and then steadily fall back and by 2023/24 they were almost back to pre-pandemic levels. Bus speeds are still in decline and were slower during the quarter when compared to Q2 last year and the pre-pandemic baseline. Bus speeds in Inner NE, Inner SE, Inner SW and Outer SE London remain above pre-pandemic levels.
The dual Covid impacts of reduced passenger numbers and less traffic disruption had a large boosting effect on reliability in 2020/21 and to a lesser extent in 2021/22. In 2022-23 the network reliability performance had deteriorated beyond the pre-pandemic baseline, and this continued in 2023/24 and into 2024/25. Quarter 2 EWT performance was worse than Q2 last year. Before the start of the pandemic, inner London EWT had been improving whilst outer London had recorded a deterioration. Pandemic restrictions then brought about significant improvements across all areas of London. In quarter 2 all areas of London recorded worse EWT results than pre-pandemic levels, but Outer SW London performance stood out as being better than Q2 last year.
Punctuality of low frequency services also saw a similar temporary boost due to Covid impacts after which performance deteriorated. Like EWT, on-time performance for the latest quarter was worse than Q2 last year. Night bus performance had returned to more normal levels at a faster rate than day routes and in the latest quarter the percentage of night buses on-time was below pre-pandemic levels and worse than the same period last year.
International Bus Benchmarking Group
London is a member of the International Bus Benchmarking Group (IBBG), an international knowledge sharing network of bus companies. It was established in 2004 and is facilitated by Imperial College London.
Benchmarking is a continuous systematic process for evaluating the products, services, processes or organisations that are recognised as representing best practice for the purpose of organisational improvement. A blend of operational and customer metrics are used to track the performance of the bus network.
Every year, a review of buses performance monitoring is evaluated internally and presented to TfL's Independent Investment Programme Advisory Group (IIPAG) by Imperial College London to justify expenditure and ensure quality of service provided to passengers.
-
The Performance of London Buses Compared to Other World Cities 2022
-
The Performance of London Buses Compared to Other World Cities 2021
-
The Performance of London Buses Compared to Other World Cities 2020
-
The Performance of London Buses Compared to Other World Cities 2019
-
The Performance of London Buses Compared to Other World Cities 2018
-
The Performance of London Buses Compared to Other World Cities 2017
Demand-responsive bus performance
In 2019-20 we ran 2 service trials in Sutton and Ealing to explore how demand-responsive buses could:
- Complement current public transport services
- Reduce car dependency
We suspended and closed the trials in spring 2020 because of Government advice on non-essential travel.