Transport For All requested a meeting after an Officer responded on behalf of Leon Daniels, which I made you aware of before arranging this meeting. Note, the meeting requested was also on behalf of an elected Council member. We are now escalating the matter locally through political channels and I look forward to hearing from you again once that process is complete. In the meantime, via Freedom of Information and EIA legislation, please provide any reports or correspondance that led to the conclusion that a south bound bus stop is not possible at this location, alongside any designs and plans for a southbound bus stop at Edmonton Green Rail Station that have been produced, alongside any plans you hold of the bus stop that existed here prior to the removal of the bus stop in 2004 when articulated buses were introduced. Also, relating to the bus station, also via FOI / EIA, please provide any documents and plans that relate to the recent closure of bus stop D at Edmonton Green Bus Station, that provides a spare double bay bus stop that could accomodate a number of buses presently stopping on Hertford Road bus stop G. At present, bus stop E, also a double bay bus stop, serves the 192, W6 and W8. All other buses stop on the highly constrained stop G. Taking Canada Water as a case study, each double bay stop could be used for at least four regular routes, plus additional night buses. It would therefore be possible to have the following configuration: •Stop E : (Combining all westbound services): W6, W8, 102 and 144 •Stop D : 192, 491, 259, 149 and N279. •Stop G : Through services only, 349 & 279. I seperately set out that by widening the concourse by approximately 2m, you resolve the pinch point created by the station office, allowing for two additional bays, which would facilitate closure of Stop G, bringing all southbound services into the bus station, consistent with the existing arrangement for all northbound services. Interchange and customer experience is transformed and there would be considerably less congestion for southbound traffic as less buses park on Hertford Road and trigger traffic lights on the single carriageway section on approach to Stop G.

---

TfL Reference numbers: 2697-1718, 2677-1718, 2649-1718,  2601-1718, 2575-1718, 2561-1718, 2237-1718 and 2336-1718.

Thank you for your requests (reference numbers above) received by Transport for London (TfL) between 6 and 16 December 2017 asking for various information relating to local transport issues around the Edmonton and Enfield areas.

Your requests have been considered in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Information Regulations and TfL’s information access policy. I can confirm TfL does hold the information you require.

However, given the extent of the information you are looking for as outlined in the six open requests and the additional two requests we have answered in the last two months, we are applying Regulation 12(4)(b) as we believe that the cumulative burden of answering the requests is manifestly unreasonable’ because providing the information you have requested would impose unreasonable costs on us and require an unreasonable diversion of resources. Whilst the Environmental Information Regulations do not specify a limit at which requests become unreasonably burdensome, the Information Commissioner has suggested that the 18 hour limit set by Parliament in respect of the Freedom of Information Act is a reasonable starting point: https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1615/manifestly-unreasonable-requests.pdf

The potentially relevant information which we hold covers several transport modes and comprises a large number of potentially relevant emails, documents and correspondence held in various separate storage systems, all of which would have to be reviewed to ascertain their relevance to your requests. Information is held by numerous people within different business areas within TfL, in both electronic and paper files, all of which would have to be manually searched, to some extent at least, to answer your requests.

The use of this exception is subject to a public interest test, which requires us to consider whether the public interest in applying the exception outweighs the public interest in disclosure. We recognise that the release of information would promote accountability and transparency in public services and also help address your particular concerns about these transport issues. However, the time it would take to provide the information you have requested would divert a disproportionate amount of our resources from its core functions. On balance we consider that the public interest currently favours the use of the exception as we have not identified an overriding public interest that would justify responding to these requests under the EIR.

Please see the attached information sheet for details of your right to appeal.

Yours sincerely

Sara Thomas

FOI Case Officer

FOI Case Management Team

General Counsel

Transport for London

Back to top

---