FOI request detail

West Dulwich Street Improvements, CPZ and Healthy Route

Request ID: FOI-0799-2425
Date published: 10 July 2024

You asked

Follow up from 0138-2425 Please can you provide a copy of the outcome of the review of the TPR/Rosendale Road junction proposals which you mention, including of pedestrian as well as cyclist benefits and the assessments of the Lancaster Avenue/TLRN junction scheme post implementation of the scheme and 20MPH speed limit also referenced ( your words suggest there was only an assessment before implementation of the scheme). We would reiterate that collectively we remain concerned about the impact that banned turns ( left as well as right) would have on nearby streets in terms of congestion, high traffic speeds and safety including at their junctions with the TLRN. We are also concerned that Lambeth will implement the Cycleway south of Thurlow Park Road and the West Dulwich Street Improvements in advance of there being a suitable design for the Rosendale Road TLRN junction and for mitigation elsewhere. Regarding the rest of your response the following information is still awaited ( highlighted in blue): • What discussions have taken place between Lambeth and TfL regarding potential impacts on bus journey time and reliability on ‘boundary’ and other nearby roads i.e. Croxted Road, Robson Road, Norwood Road, Tulse Hill gyratory, Thurlow Park Road, South Croxted Road? If so what was the outcome of these discussions. Have any taken place since the Streatham Wells LTN was withdrawn? Except in respect of the 322 and implicitly the 201 and P13. • Has TfL undertaken any Road Safety Audits for works to the TLRN junction Rosendale/Thurlow Park Road? If so please can we see the outcome of these and the Designer’s Response. If not when will these be done? The link provided relates only to the TLRN junction with Croxted Road. • Similarly, please can we see the results of any equalities impact, traffic modelling or air quality assessments which have been undertaken ( in respect of TfL assessments). Please can you provide details of Lambeth plans to extend the existing double yellow lines in Robson Road to create wider passing places to improve the flow of buses and traffic in this location or a web link to relevant Lambeth page. PPS I have now managed to down load the CPZ plan. It was proving impossible before. I note that additional passing places are to be created on Robson Road with more double yellow lines. However pinch points will remain and in particular at bus stops and at the junction with Norwood Road where the limited green time allows three vehicles through from Robson Road at any one green stage. Will these propsoed arrangements be sufficient to ensure no additional delays to the 322 on Robson and Parkhall Road?

We answered

TfL Ref: FOI-0799-2425

 

Thank you again for your requests. Firstly, we are pleased you have taken up our offer to meet.  Our Local Communities and Partnership team will be in contact to arrange a suitable time and date with you.

 

Your request for further information has been considered under the terms of the Environmental Information Regulations (EIRs). I can confirm that we hold some of the information you require. 

  

TfL and Lambeth officers met to discuss the West Dulwich LTN on 9 April 2024. Following the meeting, LB of Lambeth provided further information on their proposal and planned monitoring strategy, which has been reviewed. We wrote to the borough on the 26 April 2024 setting out our view on the proposal and our response is copied below. 

 

“Thank you for supplying the data on the West Dulwich LTN.  I took an action from our Lambeth LTN catch up on 9th April to review the West Dulwich proposal, which is now completed and I have discussed with other internal colleagues. Our view on the proposal is outlined below:

 

From reviewing the LTN proposals and data, our expectation is there would be some increase flows on Lancaster Avenue, Idminston Road, Rosendale Road, Norwood Road, Robson Road and potentially Croxted Road. Based on the 2021 traffic data presented, traffic volumes through the LTN zone are moderate and we would estimate an increase of around 100-200 vehicles per hour around the zone. 

 

Our primary concern would be any impact on the Norwood Road which supports several bus services. We would expect that mitigation measures would be bought forward should there be an impact to buses on this strategic corridor. We would also flag that the change is likely to result in more flow on Lancaster Avenue which would result in increased queuing at the Norwood Road signals. Due to the importance of the Norwood Road bus corridor, we want to be clear that we would be limited in the changes we could make to the traffic signal to mitigate this impact. 

 

We would also have concerns if there were impact to bus services on the A205 Thurlow Park Road, Croxted Road or Robson Road and would request that these form part of the overall monitoring strategy.  

 

Some of the text within the Lambeth LTN Monitoring Strategy is no longer relevant in a post-covid environment.  E.g. Rather than avoiding the bus or tube, we’d actively encourage use of these sustainable modes and the support inclusion within publicity associated with the LTN.

  

We appreciate that the monitoring plan specifically refers to monitoring the effect on bus journey times, but we are not clear on the outcome the borough would accept as a success or require mitigation measures. We would appreciate confirmation from you on what steps would be taken should there be any bus performance concerns and in what timeframes you would investigate and seek to implement such measures.

 

Given the scope of the scheme, we do not have concerns which would mean we object to the proposal as an experiment, although we do request the additional bus monitoring and mitigation information outlined. We would also request that a TMA notification is submitted due to the potential impact on the Strategic Road Network along Norwood Road”. 

 

As advised previously many of your points about designs or plans and traffic mitigation should be directed to the London Borough of Lambeth who are developing the proposals. 

 

It seems that you were sent the RSA (1) for the Croxted Road scheme rather than Rosendale, in our previous response, by mistake. Please find attached the correct one.

 

Please see the attached information sheet for details of your right to appeal as well as information on copyright and what to do if you would like to re-use any of the information we have disclosed. 

 

Yours sincerely

 

Eva Hextall 

FOI Case Management Team

General Counsel

Transport for London

Attachments

Back to top

Want to make a request?

We'll email you the response within 20 working days.


We'll publish the response online without disclosing any personal information.